Completely perplexed by the use of the term f****t in this context (anyone?) but I absolutely love this post to a board thread discussing the Year Without Disney project. At least, I think I do.
i actually side with the liberal f****t totally. although i assume being a gullible liberal (or middle aged woman) means you swallow hook line and sinker any band of f***wits preaching a social paradigm off “science”, i can at least respect a legal and unified boycott to at least encourage a company to stop making false claims. f*****s saying you hate america if you dare say anything bad about rampant consumerism are just as bad if not worse. now if the rest of the libf***s would actually learn from this that maybe their precious social programs were just as worthless we might get somewhere
Also, a thoughtful article in the St. Petersburg Times today.
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
At first I assumed it meant [redacted] but I think it means f****t, give the subtitle of the gentleman’s blog. I am as open-minded as the next person about reading diverse opinions, and isn’t free speech a wonderful thing? Hey Glenn Beck, you go, gurl!
But when it comes to the word “f****t,” [redacted] that [redacted]. I wouldn’t even link to it, which I guess makes me an even bigger liberal f****t than you.
Are you sure it means the same thing that it means to us?